Wednesday, September 3, 2008

The Truly Scary Thing About Palin

Ever since the surprise nomination of Sarah Palin as John McCaine's running mate the press has been filled with stories relating to her lack of experience, her position on abortion and even absurdly irrelevant discussions of her pregnant teenage daughter. All of this has served to distract the public from what may be the strongest problem with Palin as a Vice Presidential candidate, her badly misguided positions on energy policy. Recently CNBC did an extensive interview with Sarah Palin including a frank discussion of her positions on energy policy. We reviewed this interview as well as numerous presentations by Palin on the topic of energy and renewable energy and frankly found it shocking, though not necessarily surprising. After all she is the Governor of Alaska and Alaska gets 80% of its oil revenues from oil and natural gas companies. Nonetheless, in this CNBC interview, had we not known we were listening to the governor of Alaska, we would have guessed that we were listening to a highly paid lobbyist for the big oil companies. She is that pro big oil!

Palin has long been a strong advocate for drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). When asked about her position on this she said "We need to drill, drill, drill." She has even suggested that she thinks she can persuade John McCaine to approve drilling in the Refuge even though this was one of the rare areas where McCaine disagreed with Bush. She is a big promoter of off-shore drilling and seems to discount any impact the drilling would have on the environment. When the interviewer asked her what the environmental consequences of all this drilling would be she discounted the problem by bascially dissing the environmentalists. She said that the environmentalists were wrong when they said the Alaskan oil pipeline might hurt the caribou herds. She said the herds were fine and therefore drilling in the Arctic Refuge would not have any negative impact. This was a scarily simplistic answer to an important but complex problem, something we have seen all too often from the Republican candidates. Many scientists believe that the oil pipeline did, in fact, impact the caribou herds significantly and that drilling in the arctic would cause even more damage to wildlife because of the nature of the terrain. For an excellent discussion of this see this article from the San Francisco Chronicle appropriately titled "The Last Refuge".

The interviews with Palin are worrisome not only for their content, but for the overall attitude they convey. Palin is not only pro oil, she appears anti-renewable energy. In the interview she acknowledge that her state had vast resources of renewable energy such as wind and tidal energy, and then in the same breath says ""These renewables are not proven to be economic or reliable". Not reliable! Tell that to the millions of people around the world that get their energy from solar, water and wind energy. Not economic! Tell that to the smart people in the energy industry like T. Boone Pickens who are making a nice little fortune creating and selling renewable energy.

Its not only what Palin says that is disturbing it is what she doesn't say. It appears that the term "Global Warming" is not even in her vocabulary. She says "Drill, drill, drill" but she might as well say "Warm, warm, warm" because the inevitable consequence of drilling for more oil is putting more carbon into the atmosphere. Palin was once asked about global warming, she told the conservative Newsmax.com that, while it would affect Alaska more than any other state, "I'm not one though who would attribute it to being man-made." How out of touch can you be!

We strongly urge our readers to take a look at this recent interview with Palin and hear first hand her comments on energy policy. You can find the interview on YouTube at this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GE11URmmnc.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

To say Governor Palin is "pro-big oil" and "out of touch" overlooks some key facts: First, she was a major opponenet of big oil and held them accountable for their excesses with a windfall profits tax.

Second, to say that renewables like wind, solar, and such are not reliable or cost-efficient is an absolutely TRUE statement to people like me, the average consumer. I stumbled upon this web-site in my research of home heating alternatives, and have found that where I live in the Northeast, the only options currently available and/or affordable to me are oil or maybe natural gas if I live close enough to existing lines. Some rural areas near me have no access to gas. So that leaves us with possibly investing in new bio-fuel equipment, but to be perfectly frank, it hasn't been tested enough for me to feel comfortable relying on it. I can't afford to invest in new equipment that may not work and leave me in the same dilemmna (just look at the rising cost of ethanol and its effects on food prices... that experiment has NOT been very cost-effective).

I will definately look for these alternate sources to develop further, but right now she hits the nail on the head. Unreliable, inaccessible, risky if it doesn't deliver as promised, and not cost-effective for my family.

I like your site. Keep up the good work, but please understand that the rest of us have some practical concerns that have yet to be resolved until the alternateive energy solutions become more widely accessible, better tested, and consumer friendly. Until then, drill baby drill, because we need to buy time until we get there.

Yeah, Sarah Palin totally gets it, more so than anyone else. Do you??

btw... there is no "e" in McCain